I've been thinking about some of the ideas about fat acceptance, and while I'm down with some of them, as a feminist, like not policing calories, and not trying to conform to unrealistic patriarchal blah-blah about women's bodies, and that there are v more important things than how we look, and that no-one should be discriminated against for how they look, and that fat jokes are unacceptable, just like other discriminatory jokes are unacceptable (although I still love the one about the Catholic priest and the Rabbi on the train, remind me to tell you at some point), I am very much not down with some of the other ideas.
One that I'm not down with is intuitive eating. I have some fairly major food intolerances - not actual allergies, in that my throat doesn't swell shut, I don't need a shot of adrenalin, and no-one needs to call an ambulance, but pretty bad intolerances. Watch me eat cheese, watch my body turn into an itching mess with no energy and an upset stomach. Ditto gluten. (Both of these are exacerbated by animals with fur, which given that I have five of them means I can get away with eating none at all at home, but some while I am on holidays, which considering I am in France, land of CHEESE eating and also bagettes, is good right now. But I digress). Despite not being able to tolerate dairy (specifically, beta casein) or gluten, you know what my body tells me it wants most of the time? A fucking cheese sandwich. The combination of the two things that will hit me hardest. Hi, thanks, body. I'd *love* to be too tired to get out of bed and raw from scratching. Pass that cheese sangwich, pronto. Sometimes my body also suggests that a healthy breakfast might consist of a pack of Chocolate Royales, and some sherbet. But if I eat that shit, I'm going to feel crap, I'm going to have no energy, and yes, I'm going to be covered in a nasty rash. Intuitive eating, my arse.
I am absolutely down with the idea that fat is not teh enemy. I eat it like mad, along with protein, vegetables, fruit, eggs, nuts. I try not to eat anything else. I don't beat myself up about it when I slip up, it's not about looking hot, it's about having energy, and not being sick. In essence, it's about delayed gratification. Sure, I can eat some cheese now and it feels pretty damn good while I'm eating it. But it feels much better when I have heaps of energy and am not covered in a rash. It's just that one requires me not to put a food in my mouth that for me, is a BAD food. Fat acceptance says no bad foods, no good foods, but it's just not true. In fact, I go a step further. It's utter bullshit.
I am so down with the idea of eating when you're hungry, not starving yourself, all that jazz. If you're hungry, eat. Pretty simple. But eat whatever you want? Uh huh. Sure. Not a good plan. I'm absolutely down with eating as much as you need to satisfy your hunger. But if it's not healthy real food, then you're getting instant gratification, but you're hurting yourself.
And now, apparently we need to accept fat pets too. Which frankly, is ridiculous. Cats are one thing. Dogs, as I left a comment on that post saying (only it's been deleted, because I was not toeing the fat acceptance line), are another kettle of fish. When we got our dog, he was 2kg overweight. Unlike that post was suggesting, our vet did not try to sell us reduced calorie dog food. He suggested chicken, rice and vegetables. No profit there for him. At 2kg overweight, Casper couldn't breathe properly - he wheezed constantly - he could only walk about 150 metres, and his arthritis bothered him - a lot, because there was 20% extra weight he didn't need on his poor old joints. Oh, but we should just have ACCEPTED it because fat is not teh evil. Fucking ridiculous. And pointing out that our dog had health issues because he was fat - clearly that makes me anti-fat and a hater. Sheesh.
Anyway, in future posts I will cover why health IS a moral issue. I think we've pretty much covered the body-needs-fuel bit - it's just when it's the wrong fuel, it's like putting diesel in a petrol engine. Also, we may cover cooking potatoes in goosefat, because I'm determined to do it at least once while I'm here. Those jars of goosefat look AMAZING**.
*I use the term in a fairly loose sense.
** If you've been reading my blog for a while you'll know I don't believe there is any connection between saturated fat and health issues of any sort, and also that I don't believe in low-fat diets, which not only don't work but which also make you dried up and wrinkly, like a prune but less moist.


6 comments:
FYI - your comment has not been deleted, it's in the moderation queue because I am out of town and haven't had a chance to deal with it yet. Any first time comments get moderated.
Though, frankly, if you're going to be all personal conspiracy theorist about it, I'm not sure I WANT to approve your comment.
Also, Intuitive Eating does not mean mindlessly eating. I have a ton of food allergies. I don't eat things to which I am allergic. If I crave something to which I am allergic, I try to figure out what it is my body is really needing - whether it is salt or fat or protein or whatever. I don't get why people think eating intuitively means disregarding things like allergies.
>Anyway, in future posts I will cover why health IS a moral issue.
That sounds awesome. I can't wait to hear it!
I would love to go around making the same case, albeit, possibly a smidge more obnoxiously than you'd do it.
It makes me sad to see pets that are overweight. I know they love their treaties and that for many of us food = love, but when you see how losing weight can make a beloved pet feel and move so much better, it makes it easier to help them get thinner, I think. And simply cutting back on meal portions while continuing to give treats can make a huge difference.
Have fun in France!
I just ate half a bag of marshmallows after reading that. Whoops.
I agree. I have often said that I choose to be my current body weight (technically slightly overweight, but not obese - although I used to be larger) and that that was my choice. But I chose it knowing that I could be healthier. I CHOSE to eat that packet of marshmallows just then. And damn, it was good. But I certainly don't think that that was the healthiest, or even the best choice. Is it really proper acceptance when you are ignoring all the other things? I understand that it's a totally loaded argument, but I don't think that arguing that eating mars bars for breakfast is good for your heart is going to help much...
You must read this article!Sorry to be so demanding, I have been blogging about this. It has really got me thinking about "obesity". Is it really a true medical condition, or is it just the body expressing its natural inclination. I take the research very seriously that suggests the latter, however I have no doubt that there is some other factors going on as well.
One thing for certain, fat-people should not be judged or patronised, and certainly should be accepted for their current size, and should not be put under pressure to lose weight.
Not sure why the French are skinny, they do eat a bit better than most of us, but maybe they are also very vain, and sexual selection has had a strong effect on their race?
You may also find these fat femos http://kateharding.net/interesting (actually they don't seem all that fat from their pics) but they do good some good writing about fat issues - generally a bit too femo for my taste, but still I do get something from it at times.
Of course you can just enjoy your holiday if you prefer!
I think the French not being overweight yet eating all that fatty cuisine is due to them eating only small amounts and often (was something on the telly once).
Like your comment about putting the right fuels in. That's what it comes down to.
Post a Comment